Member Portal Join Now Resources
IAF Car of the Year Transparency & Governance

Transparency & Governance

This page explains how the IAF Car of the Year programme is governed, what information may be disclosed publicly, and which safeguards are used to protect independence, credibility, procedural fairness and trust in the final outcome.

Submit Vehicle See FAQs

Governance philosophy

The IAF Car of the Year programme is governed through a methodology-first approach. Decisions are intended to follow documented rules, structured evaluation stages and defined oversight responsibilities rather than discretionary preference or external influence.

Governance mechanisms exist not only to support a single annual decision, but also to help preserve the long-term credibility, repeatability and institutional integrity of the programme as vehicles, technologies and market expectations continue to evolve.

What may be publicly disclosed

Programme transparency
  • Eligibility, submission and candidate-stage rules
  • Evaluation criteria and weighting framework
  • Testing and review methodology
  • Voting logic, decision principles and tie-break approach
Stage-based visibility
  • Official candidate, shortlist, finalist or winner status where applicable
  • Programme governance and oversight roles
  • Evaluation structure and participant selection principles
  • Methodology refinements or programme updates when relevant

Disclosure timing

Transparency does not require every element of the programme to be disclosed at the same time. Certain information may be published only when the relevant stage of the cycle has been reached, or when disclosure no longer creates unnecessary pressure, confusion or process risk.

Examples of stage-based disclosure
  • Official candidate lists after eligibility review is complete
  • Shortlisted vehicles after comparative selection is confirmed
  • Panel participants near the final evaluation period or other defined programme stage
  • Cycle-specific updates when the programme determines disclosure is appropriate
Why timing matters
  • To protect independence during active evaluation stages
  • To reduce avoidable external pressure on participants
  • To preserve clarity where review outcomes are still provisional
  • To align public communication with verified programme status

What is not generally disclosed

To preserve independence, protect participants from undue influence and maintain process integrity, certain information may remain confidential even when the overall methodology is public.

  • Individual scoring records, unless the programme expressly decides otherwise
  • Internal working notes, preliminary review drafts or non-final assessment materials
  • Private correspondence relating to ongoing evaluation activity
  • Confidential conflict-of-interest declarations and related internal review records

Conflict of interest management

Conflict-of-interest management is central to the integrity of the programme. Individuals participating in evaluation, review, technical input or voting activity are expected to declare relevant professional, commercial or financial relationships that may affect, or reasonably appear to affect, their independence.

Declaration requirements
  • Declaration before relevant evaluation or voting participation
  • Updated disclosure where circumstances materially change
  • Identification of direct and indirect commercial or advisory ties
  • Internal review under programme governance procedures
Mitigation measures
  • Recusal from specific review or scoring activity
  • Restricted participation in defined programme stages
  • Removal from voting involvement where mitigation is insufficient
  • Documented governance records of conflict-management decisions

Administrative fairness and programme controls

Governance also applies to how entries are handled, how official candidate status is assigned and how testing access is managed. Administrative steps are intended to support procedural fairness rather than create assumptions about shortlist or winner status.

Submission controls

Submission-related administration, including applicable fees and required materials, supports entry processing and review. It does not guarantee official candidate recognition, shortlist progression, finalist status or award selection.

Candidate recognition

Official candidate status is assigned only after eligibility and documentation review. This distinction helps preserve integrity between a submitted entry and a vehicle accepted into the recognised programme pathway.

Testing access

Where shortlisted vehicles are expected to be made available for testing, access must be sufficient to support meaningful and reasonably comparable review conditions. If such access cannot be achieved, programme progression may be affected.

Oversight and review

The programme includes internal oversight mechanisms intended to ensure that rules are applied consistently, scoring procedures are handled correctly and material deviations are identified and addressed in a controlled manner.

  • Verification of score compilation and weighting application
  • Review of eligibility, candidate-stage and shortlist decisions where relevant
  • Documentation of material exceptions, clarifications and governance actions
  • Post-cycle review of methodology performance and programme effectiveness

Complaints and inquiries

The IAF Car of the Year programme recognises the importance of accountability. Questions or concerns regarding process integrity, governance or procedural consistency may be submitted for review through the appropriate programme channel.

Such submissions are assessed in relation to procedural fairness, programme rules and governance controls. Requests based solely on disagreement with the final outcome, without a governance or process basis, may not constitute grounds for formal review.

Continuous improvement

Governance and transparency practices are reviewed periodically. Refinements may be introduced to reflect evolving vehicle technologies, industry expectations, programme experience and the need for stronger consistency across future evaluation cycles.

Evaluation framework

Explore the programme

About Car of the Year

Purpose and scope of the programme.
Eligibility & Rules

Submission, candidate status and programme conditions.
Jury & Voting

Evaluation structure, voting and decision safeguards.
Testing Process

How shortlisted vehicles are reviewed in practice.
Evaluation Criteria

Weighted scoring, definitions, and evaluation structure.

Back to overview

Return to the main programme page.

IAF’s Global Member Network

From regional OEMs to global tech pioneers, IAF unites a diverse community committed to shaping tomorrow’s mobility.

  • Active global outreach across key mobility regions
  • Strategic onboarding of founding corporate & expert members
  • Monthly roundtables, knowledge-sharing & draft consultations
  • Early-stage collaborations with research & policy networks

…and many more benefits designed to amplify your impact in the evolving mobility ecosystem.

Join the Federation
Explore Network

Join Us in Shaping the Future of Global Mobility

Be part of a powerful movement driving safer, smarter, and more sustainable transportation systems worldwide. Connect with leaders, influence policies, and co-create the automotive innovations of tomorrow with the International Automotive Federation.

Become a Member Explore Membership