Member Portal Join Now Resources
IAF Standards Programme

IAF Vehicle Evaluation & Assurance

Vehicle condition assessment, safety checks and evidence integrity

A proposed common method for connecting physical condition, electronic functions, software, energy systems, history and inspection limits to a traceable vehicle report.

First Edition | Working Draft 0.2 | 13 September 2026
Read the Full Working Draft48 clauses | Annexes A-N | Individual vehicle assurance
At a glance

A Vehicle Report That Shows What the Evidence Can Support

The standard addresses one identified vehicle at a recorded time, mileage, configuration and test condition. It supports informed decisions without promising that every concealed defect was found or that condition cannot change.

01

Condition

Material physical, mechanical, electronic, software and energy-system findings are tied to defined criteria.

02

Safety disposition

Critical hazards trigger immediate control and cannot be offset by appearance, value or favourable findings.

03

Evidence sufficiency

Observations, records, assumptions and unresolved questions are separated in the final report.

04

Inspection coverage

Accessible areas, excluded tests and method limitations remain visible instead of becoming implied assurance.

Assessment architecture

Five Dimensions Stay Separate in the Decision

A broad inspection may have high coverage while identifying many defects. Coverage therefore is not a quality score.

01Vehicle condition

What was observed

Physical and functional findings for the identified configuration and accessible systems.

02Safety disposition

What action is required

Critical, significant and other defects are classified without compensating averages.

03Jurisdiction checks

What rules were examined

Only the stated market requirements and profile are included in the conclusion.

04Evidence sufficiency

How strong the support is

Valid evidence, uncertainty and inconclusive outcomes are recorded separately.

05Inspection coverage

What was and was not checked

Access limits, refused work and specialist boundaries constrain every claim.

Framework structure

The Main Clauses in Six Clear Groups

This table provides a concise route through the working draft. The complete technical requirements and annexes remain available in the PDF.

Clauses Group What it covers
01-05 Foundation and Assurance Purpose, scope, terminology and the non-compensating assurance architecture.
06-13 Provider and Planning Impartiality, competence, facilities, equipment, safe work, contracts, applicability and profiles.
14-23 Core Vehicle Condition Identity, history, exterior, structure, occupants, mechanical systems, brakes, chassis, lighting and diagnostics.
24-37 Technology and Special Use Electrified systems, batteries, charging, fuels, automation, software, exceptional exposure and specialist evaluation.
38-44 Evidence and Decision Data protection, uncertainty, defects, coverage, reports, retesting and provider quality control.
45-48 Trust and Development Complaints, provider conformity, emerging technology, validation governance and revision.
Need the technical detail? The draft includes a module matrix, vehicle and jurisdiction profiles, minimum protocols, defect rules, report fields and evidence-passport structures.
Key ideas

What Readers Should Take Away

Coverage

High coverage is not high vehicle quality

Inspection thoroughness and vehicle condition are reported as different dimensions.

Safety

A critical defect cannot be averaged away

Low mileage, commercial value or a strong battery result cannot offset an immediate hazard.

Boundaries

No visible defect is not proof of hidden condition

Conclusions remain limited to accessible areas, methods and available evidence.

Independence

Commercial interests must not control findings

Sales, finance, repair and referral relationships are disclosed and actively controlled.

Time

The report describes a recorded condition

It does not guarantee future reliability, continued configuration or legal road-use permission.

Using the document

From Vehicle Identity to an Evidence-Bounded Condition Report

Development status: This edition supports technical review and controlled pilots. It does not establish an adopted or internationally recognized certification scheme.
01Confirm vehicle identity, intended use and evaluation question
02Select applicable class, technology and jurisdiction modules
03Inspect safely and extend the plan when credible indicators appear
04Classify defects and publish evidence, coverage and limitations

Continue with the full technical document

Open the complete 48 clauses and Annexes A-N for modules, protocols, defect rules and report forms.

Open IAF-EES-V1 PDF

IAF’s Global Member Network

From regional OEMs to global tech pioneers, IAF unites a diverse community committed to shaping tomorrow’s mobility.

  • Active global outreach across key mobility regions
  • Strategic onboarding of founding corporate & expert members
  • Monthly roundtables, knowledge-sharing & draft consultations
  • Early-stage collaborations with research & policy networks

…and many more benefits designed to amplify your impact in the evolving mobility ecosystem.

Join the Federation

Join Us in Shaping the Future of Global Mobility

Be part of a powerful movement driving safer, smarter, and more sustainable transportation systems worldwide. Connect with leaders, influence policies, and co-create the automotive innovations of tomorrow with the International Automotive Federation.